DIP54 : revamp of Phobos tuple types

[Maxim Fomin]

On Monday, 23 December 2013 at 11:59:34 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Monday, 23 December 2013 at 11:50:08 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> This misunderstanding arose because the name of the construct 
>> is misleading.
>
> Can explain this a bit? What makes one miss distinction between 
> language term and library type? (Hint: latter is denoted by 
> CamelCase ;))

Language exists by itself, library feature is composed from 
language features and, as it happens often, they can interact in 
unexpected/unforseen/broken way.

Take typedef and Typedef for example (bearophile often posts 
shortcommings of the latter). Irrespective of whether each of 
them is good/bad, this is a clear example of differences between 
language feature and library feature.

Personally I am upset when I get some weird Phobos structure 
which simulates language feature, rathen then having feature in 
the language in first place.