std.range.iota enhancement: supporting more types (AKA issue 10762)

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 24/12/13 13:58, monarch_dodra wrote:
> I think you are missing the point of what happens if the step is not 1 (or if
> the passed in type can have fractional input). EG:
>
> iota(0, 105, 10);
> or
> iota(0, 10.5);
>
> In this case, "back" should be 100, and not 95. To compute back, you need to be
> able to evaluate length, and to add length*inc to front.

Oh, snap.  Have we been working on the same problems for too long? :-)