Compiler hints, inlining and syntax consistency

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-12-28 22:07, Dicebot wrote:

> I have deja vu - remember talking with you about exactly this topic in
> NG several months ago :)

Perhaps :)

> (My point was that it will still work if we
> make built-in attributes qualified with a reserved module name which is
> backwards-compatible change)

And my answer to that was probably something like: that module name 
could already be in use today. Also, then we get a third way of naming 
keywords:

@property nothrow @reserved.foobar int bar ();

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg