DIP54 : revamp of Phobos tuple types

[Jakob Ovrum]

On Sunday, 29 December 2013 at 16:19:57 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> It's been discussed before - these are advanced notions that 
> won't be used frequently and naively.

I guess I'm biased by writing a lot of library code, where it's 
quite frequently used. I can imagine application code using it 
much less.

> Yeah, on the other hand we don't want to go down in history as 
> the language that named 'list' something that's emphatically 
> not that.

That's a good point.