Bypassing the postblit?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 12/30/13 7:58 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
> Am 30.12.2013 16:53, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
>> On 12/30/13 3:29 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> As I already said, the solution is another level of indirection. I had a
>>> similar discussion with Andrei a while back and he made clear that there
>>> is no intention in adding any other copy constructor / move constructor.
>>> Postblit will stay as is.
>>
>> Walter is reconsidering that.
>>
>> Andrei
>>
>
> Oh? Could you give a bit more details on the state of this?

There's no state. Just that it's an area in which Walter is opened to a 
language change. Kenji is opposed though.

Andrei