Possible @property compromise

TommiT tommitissari at hotmail.com
Fri Feb 1 22:24:38 PST 2013


On Saturday, 2 February 2013 at 03:50:49 UTC, Zach the Mystic 
wrote:
> [..]

What I'm trying to tell you through those questions is that what 
you insists on calling a struct in your proposal is really just a 
template for a namespace that lives inside a struct or a class. 
And variables of those nested struct types are the actual 
namespaces.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list