DIP23 draft: Fixing properties redux

[deadalnix]

On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 09:04:59 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 08:16:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
> wrote:
>> It is understood that the current proposal is just a draft and 
>> there must be quite a few corner cases it doesn't discuss.
>
> Here are some more test cases to think about:
>
> http://wiki.dlang.org/Property_Discussion_Wrap-up#Unified_test_suite
>
> Specifically, for ref-returning function, I assume the 
> &-operator is meant to return the address of the callable for 
> non- at property function, but the address of the returned value 
> for @properties?
>

I wanted to avoid the topic as it is basically solved for 
properties.

Andrei, is that possible to split the DIP in 2 : one for 
properties and one for other functions.

It seems that the @property part is agreed by most people, but 
the other one raise more questions.