DIP23 draft: Fixing properties redux

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 2/3/13 4:11 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
> On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 08:16:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> In brief:
>>
>> * Optional parens stay.
>>
>> Andrei
>
> Will we keep the optional -property (or similar) for those of us that
> *want* enforced parens, even with UFCS?

No. Thanks for the reminder - I updated the DIP.

> Did a sensible reasons actually ever come up for allowing optional
> parens on non-UFCS?

This is a judgment call as reasonable people may disagree on it. Walter 
and I both believe optional parens are a good thing for D. At this 
point, we don't think one more pass through the pros and cons would 
change our opinion.


Andrei