DIP23 draft: Fixing properties redux

[deadalnix]

On Sunday, 3 February 2013 at 15:16:30 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> But the spirit of the proposal seems to suggest that for all 
> intents and purposes, a property's type is the type of it's 
> return value.
>

If you want a function, then just don't annotate with @property. 
The whole point of property is that it doesn't behave like a 
function.