DIP25 draft available for destruction

[Benjamin Thaut]

Am 06.02.2013 08:38, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
> Probably it'll need a fair amount of tweaking. Anyhow it's in
> destroyable form.
>
> http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP25
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrei

What I don't get is, why is it better to have a function 
"addressOf(value)" that does exactly the same as &value? Expect that it 
is more text to type? Why is addressOf(value) more explicit then &value?

Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut