Expanding Phobos from a flat hierachy

[Robert]

+1 from me. As long as we don't have a central repository, where we
could have a separate phobos-staging package or something. At the moment
I don't think that additions to phobos were tested much in real world
before being adopted. Such an experimental section could really help and
we should try to get things in there quickly, to boost the whole process
a bit.

Best regards,

Robert

On Wed, 2013-02-06 at 19:47 +0100, Brad Anderson wrote:
> I really like the idea of an experimental section of phobos. I've 
> been thinking lately that the phobos review might be improved by 
> doing something more like this:
> 
> 1. Proposal
> 2. Review and vote of overall usefulness and whether it meets a 
> certain quality requirement.
> 3. Module is placed in experimental section of phobos with strong 
> warnings that it is a trial module and could be removed in a 
> future update.
> 4. Following a set period of time after the module has been in a 
> public release another vote is held for actual inclusion.
> 5. If yea, move to its final resting place, if nay remove it for 
> the experimental section.