immutable method not callable using argument types () - doesn't make sense
Lee Braiden
leebraid at gmail.com
Thu Feb 7 00:20:43 PST 2013
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:31:20 +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
> A.d:22:9: error: receiver for member function 'dup' is unqualified, but
> 'immutable' is required
> f = g.dup;
> ^~~~~
>
> Is this what you'd want?
Almost, it's definitely better, but what's wrong with:
"immutable object method dup cannot be called on mutable object d"
? ;)
--
Lee
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list