On DIP 23

Dicebot m.strashun at gmail.com
Thu Feb 7 10:55:22 PST 2013


On Thursday, 7 February 2013 at 16:35:17 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> I felt we were getting somewhere.
>
> Andrei

Both yes and no at the same time.

Last proposals did a great job addressing different issues 
regarding property syntax and I somewhat like them in that sense. 
But they miss an important paragraph about what properties are 
supposed to be in D semantically, when they should be used and 
what problems they try to solve. So far design feels like it is 
syntax based as opposed to use case based.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list