DIP23 Counter Proposal
Robert
jfanatiker at gmx.at
Thu Feb 7 14:04:00 PST 2013
I am not completely against this, but it feels quite artificial to make
a builtin feature complete this way. If we implement the property stuff
completely via library methods, I would like it more, but if it is
documented properly, might not be too bad:
struct S {
mixin(property(int, "i"));
}
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 16:12 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> struct S
> {
> mixin(boilerplateProperty("i"));
> }
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list