Request for comments: std.d.lexer

[Iain Buclaw]

On 8 February 2013 15:35, Dmitry Olshansky <dmitry.olsh at gmail.com> wrote:

> 08-Feb-2013 19:34, Brian Schott пишет:
>
>  On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:23:00 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 15:12:23 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>>
>>>> DMD is still consistently faster, :(
>>>>
>>>
>>> We might be getting to the part where we say that code generated by
>>> gcc is still consistently faster than code generated by ldc.
>>>
>>
>> For the lulz I compiled with "dmd -release -inline -noboundscheck -O
>> -m64 -property":
>>
>> http://hackerpilot.github.com/**experimental/std_lexer/images/**
>> times3-dmd.png<http://hackerpilot.github.com/experimental/std_lexer/images/times3-dmd.png>
>>
>> Yes, dmd vs ldc actually is a matter of 32 vs 18 ms for datetime.
>>
>
> Would be intereesting to try gdc as dmd on linux uses gcc.
>
>

What?  That's an outright fib. :-)


-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130208/72bad47a/attachment-0001.html>