std.xml validity checking is absurd

monarch_dodra monarchdodra at gmail.com
Fri Feb 8 10:08:02 PST 2013


On Friday, 8 February 2013 at 18:06:34 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 02/08/2013 09:55 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
>
> > Regardless of "where" the contract is compiled in
> (implementation
> > detail), its inclusion (or lack thereof) should be at the
> callers'
> > discretion.
>
> In case it is not obvious, I agree with all you said. :)
>
> Ali

Stupid text-based communication.

Sorry.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list