DIP26: properties defined

FG home at fgda.pl
Sat Feb 9 03:31:14 PST 2013


On 2013-02-09 11:31, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I just went over this with Kenji in his thread "Partial modification of DIP23
> to allow module level property." You _must_ be able to rely on front being a
> property.

front getter MUST be a property... as in RFC2119's MUST??
So all those 75 std @property ref T foo() are also here to stay for good?
Bah, banning ref fixed some things, but now it's back to square one again.
Maybe it's time to drop the property subject and move on? :)



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list