DIP26: properties defined

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 2/9/13 6:31 AM, FG wrote:
> On 2013-02-09 11:31, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> I just went over this with Kenji in his thread "Partial modification
>> of DIP23
>> to allow module level property." You _must_ be able to rely on front
>> being a
>> property.
>
> front getter MUST be a property... as in RFC2119's MUST??
> So all those 75 std @property ref T foo() are also here to stay for good?

I hope not.

Andrei