DIP26: properties defined

[Robert]

I already thought about this too, good enough that D choose not to use
final for const variables like Java does.

On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 12:54 -0500, Michel Fortin wrote:
> On 2013-02-09 15:22:28 +0000, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> said:
> 
> > I completely agree, I really like it. Do we want to be able to use 
> > attributes like "final", and perhaps others, when declaring a property 
> > field:
> > 
> > @property final int a;
> > 
> > The lowered functions would have the "final" attribute attached to them self.
> 
> That'd make a lot of sense.
>