Possible regression (2.060 -> 2.061) with member access

[Nick Sabalausky]

On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 23:54:09 +0100
Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote:

> On 2013-02-09 21:51, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> 
> > I think that's asking for confusion to have different visibility
> > rules inside and outside typeof().
> >
> > The typical way to access private members when really needed is via
> > a reflection mechanism, and we already have a way to do that as two
> > people have mentioned.
> 
> Couldn't typeof() be considered part of a reflection mechanism?
> 

Yea, but not the part of reflection I was trying to refer to. Wasn't
sure what to call it besides the overly-general "reflection mechanism".