Possible regression (2.060 -> 2.061) with member access

[Dicebot]

On Saturday, 9 February 2013 at 22:54:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
wrote:
> On 2013-02-09 21:51, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>
>> I think that's asking for confusion to have different 
>> visibility rules
>> inside and outside typeof().
>>
>> The typical way to access private members when really needed 
>> is via a
>> reflection mechanism, and we already have a way to do that as 
>> two
>> people have mentioned.
>
> Couldn't typeof() be considered part of a reflection mechanism?

May be, but definitely not an advanced librar'ish one - contrary 
to .tupleof and some __traits is is a pretty common guest in user 
code.