DIP26 updated

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Saturday, February 09, 2013 13:50:18 Robert wrote:
> I added sections
> - Upgrade path
> - Conclusion
> 
> to better prove my point and the concept as such.

I can unequivocally say that I think that this DIP is a horrible idea. While 
it may need some work, DIP 23 is worlds better. I definitely think that 
@property should be implemented as originally intended save for the 
unfortunate fact that we have to keep parenless function calls around. And 
this DIP definitely isn't going in that direction at all. I'm completely 
against anything which would involve not having @property on front, and I 
think that it's a complete disaster to try and disallow UFCS properties.

- Jonathan M Davis