What's missing from Phobos for Orbit (package manager)

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-02-12 15:53, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

> Well, many of those could be implemented in Orbit, especially the
> trivial ones.
>
> The way it was worded, I thought you needed those to be in phobos or
> have an implementation provided before you could start the port.  It did
> sound a little strange ;)

I would prefer if they were in Phobos, since they are generic and can be 
used by any application.

> Some of them are not trivial, and I understand those (e.g. std.process
> and std.xml), but things like !empty I think would not need a special
> implementation in phobos for you to be able to port.

I moved this functionality out of Orbit into one of my own libraries 
because it's generic and can be used by any application.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg