What's missing from Phobos for Orbit (package manager)

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-02-15 13:17, Artur Skawina wrote:

> One reason why people are asking for such a distribution model is the
> "stability" of D. IOW, both the language and compiler capabilities change
> so often that you can't expect version X of the compiler to work with
> version Y of some library. Even for reasonably close releases of these
> projects, like libs published less than ~ a year after the compiler.
> Recent examples: '=>'-lambdas, UDAs and many smaller changes. It only
> takes one library that uses a newer feature and you have to upgrade
> the compiler, which can be problematic for various reasons, including
> some /other/ used libs failing after such upgrade. Figuring out a working
> set of tools and libs can be hard, and require maintaining local changes
> to several external projects/libs.

Isn't something a company or organization would do and support the whole 
package.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg