DIP26 reworked

deadalnix deadalnix at gmail.com
Sun Feb 17 04:57:35 PST 2013


On Sunday, 17 February 2013 at 12:55:46 UTC, Robert wrote:
> Although this critique does not really apply to DIP26, but 
> rather DIP23
> (they still need to be resolved as DIP26 builds on the concept 
> of
> optional parentheses of DIP23) but I would like to know what is 
> bad
> about the things DIP26 introduces and most importantly why.
>
> Thanks again for constructive feedback.

Yes, I oppose the same critic to DIP23.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list