The DUB package manager

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-02-16 20:07, Sönke Ludwig wrote:

> I was thinking more along the lines of make, cmake, D based build
> scripts in the form as proposed in the past here and others. Such
> procedural build files often tend to get bloated over time and hard to
> work with. While this is not necessarily a problem with the tools
> itself, it can still make people look for alternatives.
>
> That said, if a scripting language is used (almost) purely to provide a
> declarative system as in your example, it doesn't have to be bad at all.
> The question that arguably remains is just if the added flexibility is
> actually useful or necessary and if such a thing "pulls its own weight"
> (WRT implementation and API complexity).
>

I think so.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg