What's missing from Phobos for Orbit (package manager)
nazriel
spam at dzfl.pl
Sun Feb 17 14:21:24 PST 2013
On Saturday, 16 February 2013 at 15:13:18 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
> On 2013-02-15 18:16, nazriel wrote:
>> As for XML module, we have this shiny candy:
>>
>> http://opticron.no-ip.org/svn/branches/libdxml2/xml.d
>>
>> From what author says it is semi phobos ready.
>> Already supports up to BidirectionalRanges.
>>
>> Author got a bit tired of fighting ranges, so if somebody
>> could help,
>> probably we could get it into phobos quite quick.
>>
>> As a side note, I have used it in several projects already,
>> and I am
>> really happy with this (libdjson is also worth a note:
>> http://opticron.no-ip.org/svn/branches/libdjson/json.d)
>
> As I said in a previous post:
>
> "Since I'm already have a working XML module I don't want to
> replace it
> with anything else without knowing it is/will be included into
> Phobos.
> If I'm going to replace a module I don't want to do it more
> than once."
I wasn't talkig directly to you. Just putting KXML as an option
for new std.xml
I agree that switching to kxml at this point would be totally
pointless for you.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list