Possibility of non stop-the-world GC in the future?

[Sergei Nosov]

On Tuesday, 19 February 2013 at 07:36:43 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> This is unreasonable. D targets itself as a system programming 
> language, among the others usage cases, and thus request to 
> have a compiler-enforced memory usage guard is perfectly valid. 
> What shall it do if something "fancy" is attempted in @nogc? 
> Issue a compile-time error, profit!

I have nothing against @nogc. It seems to be a nice idea. I would 
like to see a way to "talk to GC" in D.

What I'm saying is things seem not to be that bad right now.