Purity, @safety, etc., in generic code

deadalnix deadalnix at gmail.com
Fri Feb 22 08:35:21 PST 2013


On Friday, 22 February 2013 at 15:32:42 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
> Yes, then the B's definition should raise "mutable A.foo() is 
> not
> overridden but hidden in B" (but doesn't because of bug 8366).
>

I don't really understand why adding a special case for something 
that has no real use case.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list