Update vibe.d Phobos documentation?
Sönke Ludwig
sludwig at outerproduct.org
Sat Feb 23 02:55:49 PST 2013
Am 22.02.2013 20:34, schrieb Steven Schveighoffer:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:17:06 -0500, Sönke Ludwig
> <sludwig at outerproduct.org> wrote:
>
>> Am 21.02.2013 18:17, schrieb Sönke Ludwig:
>
>>> Oh sorry, the problem is that I generated the docs on Windows and the
>>> two files differ just by the case of the first character - so one was
>>> overwritten by the other. I'll regenerate them on Linux when I have some
>>> time.
>>>
>>
>> Done.
>
> Still doesn't look right. RedBlackTree is listed as a template, but no
> methods or fields are listed.
>
> BTW, I really like this format. I think once these issues are ironed
> out, it should be moved to Phobos docs.
>
> -Steve
Fixed.
I think it would be a good idea to put the new documentation into a kind
of half-official place next to the classical docs until they are deemed
error-free. That way the exposure would be higher, so that the remaining
bugs can be found faster.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list