The new std.process is ready for review

Timon Gehr timon.gehr at gmx.ch
Mon Feb 25 13:36:34 PST 2013


On 02/25/2013 08:57 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 2/23/2013 6:58 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 06:46:13PM -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>> Possibly, but Walter takes a very dim view on most any code breakage,
>>> even if it means simply changing a makefile to make your code work
>>> again,
>>
>> I find this rather frustrating...
>
> Consider the common complaint from numerous people that "my code breaks
> with every new release".
>

I might be biased but I think a good portion of them are because of 
regressions.

> Even if the fix is "simple".
>

Simple fixes should be (semi-)automated by appropriate tooling.

> Just today, rdmd doesn't compile anymore.
>

Because of a Phobos regression.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list