The new std.process is ready for review

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-02-26 17:45, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

> without extra allocation.  However, we have two conflicting parts to
> spawnProcess that would be optional -- the variadic arg list, and the
> optional redirected handles and configuration.
>
> We could just go full-bore variadic...

I'm thinking named parameters, unfortunately we don't have that :(

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg