The new std.process is ready for review

[H. S. Teoh]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 09:07:06PM +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-02-26 17:45, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> 
> >without extra allocation.  However, we have two conflicting parts to
> >spawnProcess that would be optional -- the variadic arg list, and the
> >optional redirected handles and configuration.
> >
> >We could just go full-bore variadic...
> 
> I'm thinking named parameters, unfortunately we don't have that :(
[...]

Y'know, it would be nice if AA literal syntax could be used for that
purpose, if the compiler could be made aware of its meaning so that no
actual allocation is done at runtime.

But maybe it's a bit too late for that.


T

-- 
PNP = Plug 'N' Pray