Typesafe variadics in any position

[H. S. Teoh]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:38:39PM +0100, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 February 2013 at 20:29:51 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
> wrote:
> >Having a conversation about the design of the new std.process, I
> >lamented that typesafe variadics must be the last element in the
> >list of parameters.
> 
> Could the idea be expanded into allowing optional arguments in front
> of non-optional ones, when it is not ambiguous to do so?

+1.


T

-- 
What do you get if you drop a piano down a mineshaft? A flat minor.