DIP27 available for destruction

[Timon Gehr]

On 02/27/2013 12:18 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27 February 2013 at 11:01:01 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> I see. This problem does not occur. (There is no UFCS in the above code.)
>>
>
> It occurs the same way with UFCS as they are function call at the end.
> ...

This is an issue with the current DIP27, which my proposal does not have.
In case this is not clear yet, please provide code that supposedly has 
the issue.