DIP27 available for destruction

[Andrej Mitrovic]

On 2/27/13, Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch> wrote:
> I think the only technical problem of DIP27 outside the optional
> parentheses part is that it does not specify what is(T==function) will do.

The only problem? How about breaking every single piece of code ever
written in D?

It seems to me like people assume we can easily force people to
rewrite everything. It ain't gonna happen. This DIP was DOA from the
start.