When will we have std.log?

[Stephan]

I have to say, its capabilities looks pretty awesome!
I would actually be happy to help somehow, but you sound as if 
you know pretty much what to do and that you simply lack the time 
so far.
Let me know if there is anything I or someone else can do to 
accelerate the process. I don't know whether you want to deal 
with pull requests right now...

Stephan




On Sunday, 7 October 2012 at 18:05:08 UTC, José Armando García 
Sancio wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:47 PM, domain <do.main at 163.com> wrote:
>
>> It has been suspended for a long time. Any plan?
>>
>
> I have been working on it in my spare time. I have fixed some 
> basic API
> issues that were outlined during the review process but not 
> enough to put
> it through another review process.
>
> std.log was originally implemented in a forked phobos 
> repository but I has
> since create a separate repository so that it could be used 
> even if it is
> not part of std/phobos.
>
> One of the main concerns with std.log is that it has to two 
> different APIs
> for regular logging: fatal(), error(), info(), etc. and verbose 
> logging:
> vlog(). I have played around with a different API that would 
> merge the two.
> The old API is inspired by glog the new non-existing API is 
> inspired by
> Rust logging. I just need to spend a couple of days to 
> completely flush out
> the new API and run it by the community.
>
> Thanks,
> -Jose