Proposal for SentinelInputRange

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-02-28 15:31, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:

> while(!r.empty)  // inlined to r.front != 0
> {
>     switch(r.front) // why would another load occur here?
>     {
>        // no need to check for 0, already done
>        ...
>     }
> }

Don't you have to check for 0 anyway. You could still have more data in 
the buffer? I doesn't have to be the manually added sentential that is 
encountered.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg