Shadowing of members

[mist]

On Thursday, 10 January 2013 at 20:08:36 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> Walter Bright:
>
>> Any diagnostic that gives false positives should not be in the 
>> compiler.
>
> I generally agree.
> So do you think spotting what's discussed here is going to 
> cause many false positives?
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4407
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

Many? Even single possible case is enough. And it has been 
mentioned already - generic code gen, i.e. permutations.