Ready for review: new std.uni

[Dmitry Olshansky]

12-Jan-2013 05:31, Walter Bright пишет:
> On 1/11/2013 4:14 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>> Would an alias be appropriate in this case, so that we can put a
>> concrete name to the function return type? Or is that an abuse of alias?
>
> Actually, that sounds like a good idea.
>

Except that it's created out of template parameters by wrapping them in 
a couple of template. So not, can't do.

-- 
Dmitry Olshansky