Ready for review: new std.uni
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Sun Jan 13 23:52:27 PST 2013
On 2013-01-14 00:57, Walter Bright wrote:
> Doing this all requires a fairly comprehensive understanding of the
> innards of the back end. If LLVM is lacking one or more of 1..5, then I
> wouldn't be surprised a bit if it took me considerably *longer* to do it
> for LLVM
Sure, but if you had switch to LLVM, say three years ago, you would know
innards of the back end.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list