Ready for review: new std.uni

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-01-14 00:57, Walter Bright wrote:

> Doing this all requires a fairly comprehensive understanding of the
> innards of the back end. If LLVM is lacking one or more of 1..5, then I
> wouldn't be surprised a bit if it took me considerably *longer* to do it
> for LLVM

Sure, but if you had switch to LLVM, say three years ago, you would know 
innards of the back end.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg