Ready for review: new std.uni

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Mon Jan 14 02:19:02 PST 2013


On 1/14/2013 1:41 AM, David Nadlinger wrote:
> It's not that I think __vector, core.simd and friends would be a *bad* idea. But
> your general dismissal of auto-vectorization seems a bit too quick and
> convenient to me.

I agree it's more convenient not to implement it.

I also prefer using a lawnmower to a pair of scissors <g>.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list