Exceptional coding style

1100110 0b1100110 at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 01:26:19 PST 2013


On 01/14/2013 06:13 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:57:17AM +0100, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> On 01/15/2013 12:26 AM, mist wrote:
> [...]
>>> - I generally can understand less at once than can possibly fit with
>>> 9th font size on 24 inch screen.
>>
>> In my experience, the screen is always too small. I prefer font size
>> 12 though.
> [...]
>
> I use font size at least 15. :-P Well, it depends on what resolution I'm
> running at.  For 1280x1024, I use about 15. For my home PC running at
> 1600x1200, I use 18 or 20. I find anything less than 14 straining on my
> eyes, and anything below 12 painful.
>
> I'm a stickler for 80 column text terminals. I find that anything much
> larger than that tends to be unwieldy because your eyes have to scan too
> far a horizontal distance per line. And I like the 80 columns to fill
> the entire width of the screen. (I have stopped believing in tiling or
> overlapping windows. Maximize everything FTW.)
>
> But then again, I don't expect anyone else to share my peculiar
> configuration.  :-P
>
>
> T
>
You know, that's almost exactly how I like my stuff.

It still seems weird.  =P


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list