Shadowing of members
mist
none at none.none
Wed Jan 16 03:17:01 PST 2013
On Wednesday, 16 January 2013 at 08:18:53 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> mist:
>
>> Many? Even single possible case is enough. And it has been
>> mentioned already - generic code gen, i.e. permutations.
>
> Even one case is enough to kill it?
>
> Do you want to add that case in this ER, for future reference
> purposes?
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4407
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
Yes and this is the very difference between compiler and static
analysis tool, in my opinion. Compiler should never ever reject
valid use cases, it does not matter how small chance of meeting
those is.
Also I am not Walter and second question has probably been
targeted wrong :)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list