Shadowing of members

mist none at none.none
Wed Jan 16 03:17:01 PST 2013


On Wednesday, 16 January 2013 at 08:18:53 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> mist:
>
>> Many? Even single possible case is enough. And it has been 
>> mentioned already - generic code gen, i.e. permutations.
>
> Even one case is enough to kill it?
>
> Do you want to add that case in this ER, for future reference 
> purposes?
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4407
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

Yes and this is the very difference between compiler and static 
analysis tool, in my opinion. Compiler should never ever reject 
valid use cases, it does not matter how small chance of meeting 
those is.

Also I am not Walter and second question has probably been 
targeted wrong :)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list