Focus

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-01-19 03:50, Andrey wrote:

> I haven't seen such situations yet. According to OOP concept they must
> be very rare, so I tend to consider them more of architecture and logic
> mistake (and C++ is one big architecture and logic frankenstein).

In theory and according to the OOP concept they might not be needed but 
when it comes to actually implement a OO concept it can turn out to be 
handy to have. That is, accessing a private member in the same module.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg