D popularity

[H. S. Teoh]

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:57:39PM -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 1/21/13 10:32 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:03:55 -0500
> >Andrei Alexandrescu<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org>  wrote:
> >
> >>On 1/21/13 3:06 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> >>>I have to admit that ddoc hasn't really done it for me (yet). I
> >>>think the impediment is that the default output needs some work
> >>>(mainly in CSS and indexing) before it is useful as actual
> >>>documentation.
> >>
> >>We should make a few macro batteries (HTML, mobi, pdf) readily
> >>available in e.g. tools/ or examples/.
> >>
> >
> >Is that possible? PDF is binary, but I thought DDoc only did text
> >output? Come to think of it, how *do* the non-html versions of the
> >docs currently get generated?
> 
> LaTeX.
[...]

Speaking of which, did you manage to polish up the LaTeX macros to
produce decent output? I'd love to take a look if you did -- I'm a LaTeX
fan.


T

-- 
Those who've learned LaTeX swear by it. Those who are learning LaTeX
swear at it. -- Pete Bleackley