@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[David Nadlinger]

On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 17:51:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> No. The complications come from the fact that (a) nobody could 
> agree what should be a @property and what shouldn't; (b) 
> @property adds noise for everybody for the sake of a corner 
> case (functions returning delegates); (c) the @property 
> discipline failed to align itself in any way with better code 
> quality.

The simple(r) explanation is: The current *implementation* is 
broken.

David