Make dur a property?

Johannes Pfau nospam at example.com
Thu Jan 24 11:29:17 PST 2013


Am Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:26:25 +0100
schrieb "Jonathan M Davis" <jmdavisProg at gmx.com>:

> On Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:30:46 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > On 1/24/13 4:28 AM, monarch_dodra wrote:
> > > We actually have one, which I think I agree with:
> > > http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP21
> > 
> > Walter convinced me last night that eliminating @property is more
> > sensible.
> 
> Well, that's bad news. It's bad enough that @property hasn't been
> properly sorted out, but getting rid of it completely disregards the
> problems that it's trying to solve. Getting rid of @property would be
> a horrible move IMHO.
> 
> - Jonathan M Davis

Especially as it means that we have to deprecate @property first and
it'll probably stay around for at least another year.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list