@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[Andrej Mitrovic]

On 1/24/13, Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> This has turned into a monster. We've taken 2 or 3 wrong turns somewhere.

It is super-ironic that you want to simply pull-out and destroy a
feature because it wasn't properly defined or implemented, yet you
single-handedly introduced UDAs into the language with its own syntax
without any prior approval of the community.

Will we be making a "UDAs - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?"
thread a year from now?