@property - take it behind the woodshed and shoot it?

[Adam D. Ruppe]

On Thursday, 24 January 2013 at 21:53:27 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
> Right, this conversation is about removing @property, which 
> invalidates your argument by turning the data into a function, 
> which is what we want to avoid.

Yeah, that's why I'm against the OP proposal.

> Also you might want to run your examples before posting them.

I did.... on my modified dmd where @property has a less stupid 
(but still buggy) implementation. It works correctly there!